When AB was prosecuted for having sexual intercourse with an underage girl he wanted to rely on the defence that he reasonably believed the girl to be 16. When he was denied this opportunity because of previous criminal charges, AB claimed that this was in breach of his human rights. Music from bensound.com
Share this post
AB v HM Advocate [2017] UKSC 25
uklawweekly.substack.com
AB v HM Advocate [2017] UKSC 25
Jun 19, 2017
Listen on
Substack App
RSS Feed
Recent Episodes
AB v HM Advocate [2017] UKSC 25